I really wonder why on earth the 27C3 accepted a nonsensical paper like this into their programme. So .. stupid. You read half the proposal and it's already kinda obvious that the presenter has no idea what he is talking of. Fundamental errors, obvious misinterpretations, outdated issues: this is just FUD.
And apparently this talk even is anonymous? Such a coward! FUDing around anonymously is acceptable at the CCC?